Thursday, February 14, 2008

The Future of Wisdom: An Integral Pluralist Christian Mandala

THE FUTURE OF WISDOM

The Rebirth of ‘Sapiential Christianity’ in the Emerging Global Context:

An ‘Integral Pluralist’ and ‘Relational Emergent’ Vision of Encompassing Reality

“We have already seen a quaternary expression of the mystery of Christ in early Christianity. The four principal yogas, or Hindu spiritual paths, correspond to four dimensions of the human person and also to the four poles of this theological quaternary, which we may call the Christian mandala. The mandala, or quaternary figure, represents the mystery of the cross, which is realized as Trinity and creation become one in Christ. The figure described by the representation of this mystery in the Pauline Letters, however, is based on and inseparable from a particular historical occurrence, the paschal event of Jesus’ death and resurrection. In contrast to a figure of cosmic and human wholeness which would correspond to the perennial philosophy, this Pauline figure visually symbolizes an event that has become the center and pivot of history and represents the progressive consummation of history as an integration, or recapitulation, of all reality around that center.

“The Christian mandala, however, also has an ontological level of significance. The ultimate quaternary, as we find it in the New Testament and in the theological writings of the second century, is that of God, Word, Spirit, and World. The Word is that Divine Word, Wisdom, or Son which has become a human person in Jesus Christ.

“This quaternary vision, as we see already in Irenaeus, offers itself today as the structural framework of one possible new Christian wisdom. Christian theology has been until now – quite understandably – largely confined to the dimension of the Word (II). This pluralistic paradigm, on the other hand, presents all reality gathered together at its center (which is first of all the Risen Christ) and unfolding into four dimensions. It is our contact with the Asian traditions—and our consequent awakening to the absolute unitive principle (1) in its autonomy and purity—that open our theology consciousness to this wider view.”

The Future of Wisdom: Towards a Rebirth of Sapiential Christianity, by Bruno Barnhart, Pg. 54, 55, 126, 127

AN INTEGRAL PLURALIST CHRISTIAN MANDALA

The Divine Energy of

PERFECT TRUTH

Ethereal Rational (NT)

Abstract Utilitarian

The Integrative Mind

The Path of Intellective Unity

I.

GOD

Transpersonal, Personal

“Absolute Unitive Principle” Inwardness, Self-Possession,

“The Interior Contemplative East”

Historically Expressed in the Eastern Perennial Non-Dualist Traditions

The Divine Energy of

PERFECT LOVE

Oceanic Idealist (NF)

Abstract Cooperative

The Compassionate Heart

The Path of Relational Harmony

II.

WORD

Wisdom, Son

“Disengaged Reason”

“The Rational Principled North”

Historically Recapitulated and Reformulated in the Secular Modern Rationalist, Empirical, Analytical and Linguistic Movements

(Transcendent, Immanent, Relational)

TRINITY

|

THE MYSTERY OF

THE CHRIST-EVENT

|

CREATION

(Unity, Plurality, Relation)

III.

SPIRIT

Creativity, Passion

“Unitive Expressiveness”

“The Romantic Passionate South”

Historically Recapitulated and Reformulated in the Secular Modern Romantic, Transcendentalist, Existential and Pragmatic Movements

The Divine Energy of

PERFECT GOODNESS

Territorial Guardian (STj)

Concrete Cooperative

The Ethical Will

The Path of Good Works

IV.

COSMOS

History, Action

“Political-Social Freedom”

“The Exterior Activistic West”

~

Historically Recapitulated and Reformulated in Secular Modern Liberal and Post-Modern Liberationist Social and Political movements

The Divine Energy of

PERFECT BEAUTY

Volcanic Artisan (SFp)

Concrete Utilitarian

The Enchanted Soul

The Path of Aesthetic Creativity

FMI, contact Rich Lang: Omega House, 371 S. Mountain Ave., Ashland, OR 97520 (541) 488-2304 omegahouse@charter.net

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The Mandala shows us certain purely formal aspects of the divine process. As such it relation to the divine can not be properly called symbolic since it does not create give us its contents. It does not mediate. Its mystery consists in its manifestation but not as a manifestation