Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Concepts of God: Course Syllabus

Course Syllabus

CONCEPTS OF GOD

Philosophy 199

Winter Quarter 2008

Course Instructor: Richard C. Lang

Credit Hours: 2 credits

Thursday afternoons, 3:00-5:00 p.m.

Class Size Limit: 40 students

General Description:

This course examines the history of the concept of God in the Western religious, philosophical, scientific and cultural traditions. We will give special attention to the 17th Century Age of Reason, the 18th Century Age of Romanticism, the 19th Century Age of Ideology, the 20th Century Age of Anxiety, and the 21st Century Age of Globalization. We will also examine the analogical, symbolic, dialectical and symbolic nature of religious language, and its complex relationship to philosophy, history, science, linguistics, literature, poetry and the arts.

Course Objectives

Students will be able to:

  1. Identify the viewpoints of the leading thinkers in the western intellectual tradition who have addressed the question of God. These thinkers include Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, John Scotus Erigena, Al-Farabi, Avicenna, Al-Ghazali, Anselm, Averros, Maimonides, Bonaventure, Aquinas, William of Ockham, Meister Eckhart, Giordano Bruno, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Rene Descartes, John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Leibniz, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, Ludwig Feurerbach, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Ludwig Wittgenstein (to name a few).
  2. Identify and discuss the “divine attributes” as developed in the thinking of classical theism, and the various ways that these “divine attributes” have been contested, qualified and challenged in the modern period
  3. Identify the major scientists of the modern period who have had a profound influence upon the ways people conceive of God
  4. Discuss the relationship between four historical phases of religious development: the local, canonical, critical and global phases of development
  5. Discuss the dialectical tension within religious traditions between the conserving influences of exemplar, community, scripture and tradition on the one hand and the liberalizing influence of philosophy, science, poetry and the arts on the other
  6. Discuss the analogical and symbolic nature of religious language in its complex relationship to philosophy, science, history, myth, poetry, imagination and the arts.

Required Texts:

God: A Guide for the Perplexed, by Keith Ward

The Experience of God: Icons of the Mystery, by Raimon Panikkar

Evaluation Techniques

Students will be graded on the basis of attendance, participation, weekly written assignments and self-assessment paper. All students are expected to attend all class sessions. It is the responsibility of the student to inform the instructor in advance if he or she is unable to attend class. Unexcused absences will definitely affect the final grade.

Writing Assignments

Students will write a two-page paper each week that summarizes and responds to the text reading assignments.

In addition, they will write a two-page personal growth self-assessment paper at the end of the course, reflecting upon what they have learned about themselves and their own construction of reality.

Contact Person

Rich Lang, office phone: 488-2304; omegahouse@charter.net


Session One: Various Concepts of God

Revealed, Intuited

Real – Symbolic – Myth – Illusion

Discovered, Constructed

Objective

Unity-Differentiation-Relation

Subjective

Knowable: Revealed

Revealed & Concealed

Unknowable: Hidden

Transcendent (Beyond)

Relational

Immanent (Within)

Transpersonal

Personal

Impersonal

One: Monotheism

Unitive Pluralism

Many: Polytheism

None: Atheism

Nirvana / Brahman

All: Pantheism

Masculine

Yang/Yin

Feminine

Authority

Covenant

Equality

Truth: Mind

Truth & Love

Love: Heart

Good: Will

Goodness & Beauty

Beauty: Soul

Sagacious: Asian

Prophetic: Abrahamic

Mystical: Vedic

The Divine, Essence

The Human, Emergence

The Cosmos, Emptiness


Part I:

God: A Guide for the Perplexed, by Keith Ward

Essay and Discussion Questions

Session Two: Chapter 1: A Feeling for the Gods I

1. God, Literalism and Poetry 1;

What is the difference between a “literal anthropomorphic”, “symbolic realist” and “mythic non-realist” interpretation of the word God? Why is the word God ambiguous and problematic?

2. A World Full of Gods 4;

What is a “muse”? What does it mean to see the world as ‘full of gods’, as the Greeks did?

3. Descartes and the Cosmic Machine 7;

Who are Rene Descartes and Isaac Newton? What are their definitive books? What does it mean to see the world, like Descartes, and Isaac Newton, as the cosmic machine?

4. Wordsworth and Blake: the Gods and Poetic Imagination 9;

Who are Wordsworth and Blake? What are their definitive poems? What role did they give to the poetic imagination? How were the 18th Century Romantics different from the 17th Century Rationalists? Who is the god Apollo?

5. Conflict Among the Gods 14;

How were the ancient Greek gods different from they way they were portrayed by the 18th Century Romantics? What does conflict among the gods represent in human experience in the world?

6. Friedrich Schleiermacher: A Romantic Account of the Gods 18;

Who is Scheliermacher? What is his definitive book? How did he re-interpret the meaning of religion? What did he mean by saying that it is not really about creeds and speculative beliefs? What was it about for him? What does Schleiermacher mean by religious feeling?

7. Rudolf Otto: The Sense of the Numinous 24;

Who is Rudolf Otto? What is his definitive book? What does he mean by the sense of the “numinous”?

8. Martin Buber: Life as I-Thou Encounter 31;

Who is Martin Buber? What is his definitive book? What does he mean by ‘I-Thou encounter?

9. Epilogue: The Testimony of a Secularist 33

Who is James Frazer? What is his definitive book? What feeling do you get from Frazer’s description of the gods of antiquity? What do you make of the fact that Frazer, a modern secularist, has a feeling for the gods?


Session Three: Beyond the Gods 36

Prophets and Seers 36;

What are prophets and seers? What are the names of several of the major biblical prophets?

Basil, Gregory Palamas and Maimonides: the apophatic way 44;

Who are Basil, Palamas and Moimonides? What did they write? What is the “apophatic” way? How is this contrasted with the “kataphatic” way? What is the paradox of these two ways?

Thomas Aquinas: The Simplicity of God 50;

Who is Thomas Aquinas? What is his definitive book? What does he mean by the “simplicity” of God?

The Five Ways of Demonstrating God 53;

What are Aquinas’ five ways of demonstrating God? What is the current intellectual status of these five arguments?

Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, al-Ghazali, Sankara 57;

Who are these three individuals? What were their religious traditions? What are their central concepts of God? What are the similarities between them?

The Doctrine of Analogy 60;

What is the doctrine of “analogy”? What is the “analogical imagination” with respect to language about God? What is the strength and weakness of speaking “poetically” about God through the language of analogies, metaphors, stories and parables?

Three Mystics: The Cloud of Unknowing, Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross

What is a “mystic? Who are these three mystics? What are their definitive writings? What kind of language did they use to describe their experience of God? Why does the kind of language we use make a difference?


Session Four: The Love that Moves the Sun 67

1. The 613 Commandments 67

What is the point of all the commandments in the Jewish Tradition? How do modern secular people sometimes misunderstand the meaning of these commandments?

2. Pigs and Other Animals 69

What speculation does the author give as to why pigs may have been regarded as “unclean”? What is mana power?

3. The Two Great Commandments 71

What are the two great commandments? Where are they found in the Old Testament? In the New Testament?

4. The Ten Commandments 73

What are the Ten Commandments? To whom were they given and within what context? Is there a problem with applying the Ten Commandments as universal law for all peoples and societies?

5. Jesus and the Law 78

How does Jesus understand the nature of the law, or Torah? What does he mean when he says that he has not come to destroy the law but to full the law?

6. Calvin and the Commandments 80

How does Calvin re-interpret the Ten Commandments and apply them to the Christian faith community?

7. Faith and Works 83

What is the meaning of the debate between “salvation by faith” vs. “salvation by works?” Who is John Calvin? What did he write? How does Calvin’s emphasis on divine election (pre-destination) and human faith create new problems while attempting to solve old ones? Why does Calvin’s doctrine of divine election by grace create less anxiety in some people and more anxiety in others?

8. Theistic morality as fulfilling God’s purpose 85

What is the essence of theistic morality? Is it primarily rooted in fear or love?

9. Kant, The Categorical Imperative and Faith 88

Who is Kant? What did he write? What does Kant mean by the categorical imperative? Why did he want to construct an autonomous ethic that did not depend upon religious faith?

10. God as Creative Freedom, Affective knowledge and Illimitable Love 96

What practical difference does it make of we conceive of “God” in these terms? To what is this view of

God being contrasted? How does one’s “God concept” impact one’s actual life and relationships?
Session Five: The Poet of the World 140

The Timeless and Immutable God 140

Why did the ancients conceive of “God” as Timeless and Immutable?

The Rejection of Platonism (Plato) 144

Who is Plato? What did he write? What is Platonism? What is it about Platonism that was rejected in the modern period? What is Christian Neo-Platonism? How is it different from Classical Platonism?

Hegel and the Philosophy of Absolute Spirit 148

Who is Hegel? What did he write? What is the essence of his philosophy of Absolute Spirit? How does he radically re-interpret the meaning of Christianity?

Marx and the Dialectic of History 152

Who is Karl Marx? What did he write? What is the essence of his philosophy of “dialectical materialism”? What does it mean that he turned Hegel on his head? What was Marx’s view of religion?

Pantheism and Panentheism 158

What is pantheism? What is panentheism? What is the difference between them? (Read the wikipedia articles). What is transcendental idealism? What is process theism? How are they different?

Time and Creativity 162

What is the significance of time and creativity according to the pan-en-theistic conception of God? How is this different from both the traditional pantheist and theist views?

The Redemption of Suffering 164

What is meant by the idea of “the redemption of suffering”? What is meant by the pan-en-theistic idea that God suffers and is moved by the suffering that happens in the cosmos? How does this contrast with the traditional classical (Greek influenced) theistic idea of the “impassibility” of God? How does this view correlate with the traditional Jewish conception of God?

History and the Purposive Cosmos 167

What is the difference between conceiving history and the cosmos as “purposeless” and “purposive”? What practical consequences follow IF these are viewed as mutually exclusive propositions? Can they both be “partly right”, or must one choose between them? Can there be two ultimate realities, one personal and the other impersonal? Can there be one Ultimate reality with dual aspects, one purposeful, that is, active will, and the other purposeless, that is, passive void? Are the ultimate reality of Being and Nothingness, Essence and Emptiness mutually excusive propositions? Can they be dialectically integrated? What are the implications for global dialogue between Theism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Naturalism?

Process Philosophy: Whitehead 171

Who is Alfred North Whitehead? What did he write? What is process philosophy? What important modern religious thinkers and theologians have been deeply influenced by Whitehead?

The Collapse of the Metaphysical Vision 175

Why did “the metaphysical vision” collapse into metaphysical skepticism? Was the metaphysical vision of Whitehead proven false, or did it simply go out of fashion? What impact do you think wars and calamities have on intellectual movements? Why are some people metaphysical (or cosmological) optimists and others metaphysical (or cosmological) pessimists? What’s the difference?


Session Seven: The Darkness Between the Stars 179

1. Pascal: Faith and Skepticism 179

How is Blaise Pascal? How does he attempt to resolve the struggle between faith and skepticism?

2. A.J. Ayer: The Death of Metaphysics 182

Who is A.J. Ayer? What did he write? What is his argument for the death of metaphysics? What is rationalism? Positivism?

3. Scientific Hypotheses and Existential Questions 185

What do we mean by “scientific hypotheses”? What are the basic existential questions? To what extent can scientific knowledge answer the existential questions? Why or why not?

4. Kierkegaard: Truth as Subjectivity 188

Who is Soren Kierkegaard? What did he write? What does he mean by the idea that truth is subjectivity?

5. Sartre: Freedom from a Repressive God 191

Who is Jean-Paul Sartre? What did he write? What is his conception of God? What did he mean by the idea that existence precedes essence? What would it mean if essence precedes existence? What would it mean if essence and existence were two aspect of the same complex reality?

6. Heidegger and Kierkegaard: The Absolute Paradox 193

Who are Heidegger and Kierkegaard? What did they write? What do Heidegger and Kierkegaard mean by identifying God, or Ultimate Reality as the absolute paradox?

7. Tillich: Religious Symbols 196

Who is Paul Tillich? What did he write? What does he mean by the idea of religious symbols?

8. Wittgenstein: Pictures of Human Life 199

Who was Wittgenstein? What does he mean by the idea of various interpretative communities embodying different pictures of human life?

9. Religious Language and Forms of Life 202

What does he mean by the idea that various religions (and ideologies) are self-referential language games and forms of life? What is meant by the idea of a hermeneutical circle?

10. Religion and ‘Seeing As’ 205

What is meant by the idea of religion as ‘seeing as’? Is this different from wishful thinking?

11. Spirituality Without Belief 209

What does it mean to have spirituality without belief in God?

12. Non-Realism and God 212

What is religious non-realism? What is Jewish and/or Christian atheism? Is this an oxymoron?

13. The Silence of the Heart 215

What is meant by the silence of the heart?


Session Eight: The Personal Ground of Being 219

1. God as Omnipotent Person 219

What is the difference between classical theism and process panentheism with regard to the question of whether God is conceived as omnipotent (all powerful) or not?

2. The Problem of Evil 223

What is the problem of evil for those who believe in an all-good, all-loving, all-knowing and all-powerful God? What are some ways that theists have sought to resolve this problem? What is the problem of good for those who believe that existence is meaningless and absurd from top to bottom?

3. Fichte, Schelling, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil 224

Who are Fichte, Schelling, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche? What is meant by the idea that reality is beyond good and evil? What are its ethical and social consequences? What is the difference between detached philosophical nihilism, unconscious philistine nihilism and predatory barbarian nihilism?

4. Omniscience and Creative Freedom 227

How do traditional theists and process panentheists reconcile divine omniscience (all knowing) and natural creative freedom differently?

5. God: Person or Personal? 228

What is the difference between describing God as a person and describing God as personal? What is the difference between literal anthropomorphic language and analogical anthropological language about God?

6. Persons as Relational 231

What does it mean to describe God as relational?

7. The Idea of the Trinity 234

What is the idea of The Divine Trinity? How has it been variously interpreted?

8. The Revelatory Roots of Religion 237

According to the author, what are the revelatory roots of religion?

Summary: Seven Ways of Thinking About God 241

Explain what Keith Ward means by each of the following ideas:

1. God as the powers of being

2. God as the one beyond speech

3. God as the perfect good

4. God as self-existent creator

5. God as self-realizing spirit

6. God as ultimate good of being

7. God as personal ground of being

Which, if any, of these conceptions of God are meaningful and illuminating to you?


Part II:

The Experience of God: Icons of the Mystery, by Raimon Panikkar

Session Nine:

Chapter 1: Speaking of God. Chapter 2: The Experience of God

1. Speaking of God

Requires a prior interior silence. Has its own style. Involves our whole being. Regards God alone. Needs the mediation of a belief. Regards symbol and not concept. Includes several meanings. Does not exhaust the divine.

Leads back to a new silence.

Elaborate upon what Raimon Panikkar claims to be the nature of speech about God. What conventional ways of thinking and talking about God does this question and challenge?

II. The Experience of God

The silence of life. Constituents of the experience. Faith, acts of faith, and belief. The triple horizon of divinity.

Fragments on the experience of God. Of initiation. Passive attitude: yin

Elaborate upon what Raimon Panikkar claims to be the characteristics of the experience of God. What conventional western, archetypally masculine way of approaching the experience of God does this question and challenge?

Session Ten:

Chapter 4: Privileged Places of the Experience of God

Love. The Thou. Joy. Suffering. Evil. Pardon. Crucial moments. Nature. Silence. Propitious Places.

Elaborate on what Raimon Panikkar means by identifying the above list as privileged places of the experience of God.

Personal Growth Self-Assessment Questions:

1. As a result of this study in Concepts of God, what ideas and insights have been most engaging and illuminating to you?

2. What thinkers that we have encountered – theologians, philosophers, scientists, and poets -- have been most significant and intriguing for you?

3. How would you articulate your evolving concept of “God” or “no-God”, whatever that means to you?

4. What would you say is the personal and cultural value of studying and reflecting upon the history of concepts of God, regardless of whether one happens to believe in a definitive concept of God or not?

Monday, January 28, 2008

Contemplating the Nature of Ultimate Reality

Since the dawn of recorded history humans have been contemplating and speculating about the nature of ultimate or prime reality. Several views have gained prominence. These include the views of monists, dualists, pluralists and non-dualists. Let's explore them briefly:

"Absolute Monists" say the ultimate "number" of ultimate or prime reality is ONE. There is really only one reality, whether it is conceived as either body or mind, nature or spirit, existence or essence, being or nothingness, permanence or change, consciousness or energy, or whether these two sets of dualities are conceived as identical. There are transcendental (or spiritual, metaphysical) monists, and there are immanent (or naturalistic, cosmological) monists. They do not agree as to whether ultimate or prime reality is matter or mind, nature or spirit, but they both agree that there is ultimately only one prime reality. Either Matter (body) is "reduced" to a superficial phenomenon of Mind (Spirit), or Mind (Spirit) is "reduced" to a superficial phenomenon of Matter. Both types of monism reduce reality to one thing that excludes or diminishes the other.

"Philosophical dualists" say the "number" of ultimate or prime reality is TWO. Descartes is famous as a modern philosopher for positing the existence of two independent realities: body and mind. He came to believe that mind or consciousness exists apart from the physical body and brain, but did not offer a philosophical account as to how the two might be essentially related. In the modern secular age of scientific materialism neo-Darwinians view the mind or consciousness as nothing other than an epi-phenomenon or surface activity of the physical brain. For monistic materialists, when the body and brain die, the mind (or consciousness) dies with it. Mind (soul, spirit) has no enduring reality or awareness beyond the physical death of the body.

By way of contrast with monistic materialists, "pan-psychists" and "pan-experientialists" like Henri Bergson, William James and Alfred North Whitehead conceive of an infinite primordial mind or consciousness that eternally pre-exists and infuses matter (bodies and brains) it such a way that when finite human bodies (and brains) die there is an infinite mind or consciousness that objectively remembers, and adds to its ever expanding memory and emotion, the actual experiences of those finite bodies and minds. In this way the actual experiences of bodies and minds are preserved in the "eternal and emergent life of God" - the primordial and emergent divine mind or consciousness. Some pan-experientialists and process theologians go further and believe in the "subjective" immortal consciousness of individual persons as well as the "objective" immortal consciousness of the Universal Divine Mind. These "pan-experientialist" ideas are associated with "process panentheism" as distinguished from "pantheistic monism." In the process theological perspective, ultimate or prime reality is an integral and interdependent relationship between God, the cosmos and creativity. But it would be a mistake to see these as three independent prime realities. For "process panentheists" these three realities are integral and relational rather than external and separate from each other.

Absolute metaphysical pluralists are those who believe that prime reality is comprised of multiple autonomous realities. An absolute metaphysical pluralist might believe that the ultimate or prime reality is comprised a limited number of totally separate and autonomous entities. Or she might believe that prime reality is comprised of an infinite number of irreducible realities that can be conceived as either primordial entities or emergent processes, or both. This view is consistent with polytheism.

Classical or traditional theists are those who believe in the primordial and unchanging reality of an infinite, eternal, personal, transcendent, immanent, all-present, all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving God, and in the contingent and conditioned reality of the created universe, including all finite, living and sentient beings.

Process panentheists have modified traditional theism by positing the idea that God has two polarities in the divine nature: God's primordial nature and God's consequent nature. What this means is that God's axiological character as perfect goodness, beauty, truth and love is unchanging and everlasting. But God's "creative experience" is endlessly evolving and emerging. And so God does not have an absolute foreknowledge of all events of history and of our individual lives before they actually happen in time, though God may anticipate the various possibilities. And God does not have absolute sovereign power to dominate and coerce the open, free, emergent and creative processes of the evolving universe, and the changing events of human history. God exercises influence but it is not through authoritarian coercion but through the transcendent "lures" of the divine manifestations and human intimations of Eternal Beauty, Truth, Goodness and Love. It is not difficult to see the attraction of process panentheism to the ideas of platonic realism. At the same time, this platonic realism is augmented by an evolutionary idealism, a transcendental vision of "spiritual evolution" and "creative emergence" as the cosmos, nature, humanity and culture are persistently guided by "the divine lure" toward the realization and fulfillment of God's ultimate purpose - that all of creation might participate in and be united with the divine life through the paradoxical power of God's eternal self-emptying love.

Non-dualists are those believe that ultimate or prime reality is comprised neither of only one absolutely singular monistic reality or only two absolutely separate dualistic realities, or of an infinite number of totally separate and autonomous realities, but rather of a creative, dialogical, pluralistic and integral relationship between mutually interdependent dimensions. This paradoxical non-dualist vision of ultimate or prime reality envisions an infinite di-polar unity of opposites, a perpetual movement and "dance". It is a polymorphic and pluriform "movement" and "dance" between the One and the Many, the Unitive and the Differentiated, the Absolute and the Relative, the Infinite and the Finite, the Eternal and the Temporal, the Transcendent and the Immanent, the Beyond and the Within, the Trans-personal and the Personal, the Primordial and the Emergent, the Conscious and the Energetic, the Aware and the Experiential, the Potential and the Actual, the Ethereal and the Sensuous, the Essential and the Existential, the Majestic and the Elegant, the Sublime and the Beautiful, the Above and the Below, the Sacred and the Secular, the Comic and Tragic, the Romantic and Ironic -- that is, all the linguistically constructed "dualities" of consciousness and culture relationally engaged in an integral pluralist movement and dance .

Note: Some persons who call themselves "non-dualists" are actually "monists", having conflated the terms. This conflation is evident in the wikipedia article on "non-dualism". I believe a true understanding of "non-dualism" is neither monist nor dualist, but relationally integral (or integrally relational), that is, a "paradoxical parabola."

Still others, of course, perhaps most people, are simply content to say,"The whole thing is an inscrutable mystery inside an enigma, an infinite abyss we can never plumb, an infinite horizon we can never scale. Let the mystery be."

What's your view?

Rich Lang

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Integrating the Four Spiritualities

I've been impressed for a long time by the idea that our different personality temperaments predispose us toward different "spiritual paths." The four Jungian personality types can be characterized as:
THE VOLCANIC ARTISAN (Sensing Feeling)
THE TERRITORIAL GUARDIAN (Sensing Thinking)
THE OCEANIC IDEALIST (Intuiting Feeling)
THE ETHEREAL RATIONAL (Intuiting Thinking)

The corresponding spiritual paths of these four temperament are listed below:
1. The Volcanic Artisan Path of Artistic Expression
2. The Territorial Guardian Path of Ethical Responsibility
3. The Oceanic Idealist Path of Relational Harmony
4. The Ethereal Rational Path of Intellectual Unity

It seems to me that in the first half of life we move toward Jung's ideal of "individuation", of differentiation of the self from the collective. And in the second half of life, if we are willing to "do the work," we move more toward "integration", combining an inner wholeness of self-knowledge and outer engagement with the world around us, one that connects the wisdom of the sensory, emotive, rational and intuitive functions. In a sense we continue to reflect our innate temperament, but at the same time begin to transcend it (at least in part) through connecting it with the wisdom of the other types. We move from an exclusive, absolute dualist to an inclusive, relational non-dualist orientation of consciousness and embodiment.

I believe it is true that "highly creative people connect what other people segregate." The movement toward a higher order of human creative complexity means that we open ourselves to and cultivate a integral, plural, relational and paradoxical quality of consciousness and embodiment, introversion and extroversion, awareness and engagement, thinking and feeling, judgment and perception, intuition and sensuality.

What does this mean? It means that we honor the integral wisdom of the whole person, including the wisdom of the body, emotions, dreams, imagination, intellect, volition, conscience and intuition. And it means that we honor the integral wisdom of the the whole person not only in "intra-personal" relationship with one's self, but also in "inter-personal relationship" with our "significant others," including our partner, family, friends, and community. And further it means that we cultivate an integral relationship with the overlapping domains of work and leisure, time and money, culture and society, nature and spirit.

May we learn to integrate the paths of knowledge (ethereal rational), creativity (volcanic artisan), courage (territorial guardian) and compassion (oceanic idealist), and learn from the world's great exemplars and perennial wisdom teachers, ancient and contemporary.

May we learn to discern the sacred in the midst of the secular, to experience epiphanies in the midst of the ordinary struggles and joys of living with a sense of wonder and grace from day to day.

May we be guided by Nature's Wisdom and The Divine Spirit in the integral path of knowledge, creativity, courage and compassion. Shalom!

Monday, January 21, 2008

The True Spirit of All Religion

The true spirit of all religion -- distinct from its limited sectarian and tribal forms -- and despite its historical contradictions and perversions -- is to liberate, awaken, reconcile and transform our true humanity and the whole creation -- through transcendent, relational and immanent visions of the Divine Nature and Purpose -- as one that is progressively fulfilled and ultimately consummated -- through the creative actualization of the primordial energies of Beauty, Goodness, Wisdom and Compassion -- manifested in our lives, our communities, our societies, and our world.

Comment:

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Grand Paradox

God is the grand paradox.